Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.


To say that the report ,o| the Local Government Committee is unsatisfactory is but to feebly describe its demerits. It certainly lays down certain lines to be folio wed,, but it gives no indication whatever as to how the proposed changes are to be effected. “ Decentralisation” is a cheap war cry for an election platform; and it does not say much for the genius or capacity of the Committee .that they were unable to supplement ihat Jphrase with more detailed proposals than are to be found in the report. As we read it, however, it does not at alLfuggest the restoration of anything'approximating to the restoration of provincial government. On the cont^ry,'the proposals bear the aspect of recommending that the Oolpny should be divided into a number of local government districts, to be constituted by the amalgamation of four or more counties having unity of interest and possessing larger powers, exercising more extensive functions, and endowed with larger and more assured finances than the present local bodies now possess. Where there are counties, they would remain as they now are, with the exception of having the main roads and bridges handed over to the local district councils; where road boards still reign supreme, they also would be suffered to exist; but the continuance of the two bodies will not be permitted in any such local district. This is as it should be. As at present constituted, the functions of the county councils are so limited that they can only be. regarded as road boards on a large scale. In this Island the tendency has been to merge these boards in the councils, to the manifest economical working of the system. But in the North the contrary prevails, and county councils and road boards exist together, with the result of endless confusion. Even in Canterbury there is one county which continues refractory, and will not put the Counties Act into force. One result of ,this has been that a main bridge over' a very dangerous river has gone to ruin, and is now closed, because the Road Board within whose jurisdiction it is have not, and cannot, raise the funds to put it in repair. This is a sample of the reductio ad absurdum of local government on too small a scale. The aim of the Committee—reading between the lines of their report —is to put an end to this sort of thihg by the constitution of larger local bodies, certainly not by the restoration of provincial councils. That is a dream of the past, never to be renewed. Certain it is that our country cousins, having once -tasted the pleasures and realised the benefits of real local government, will never consent to bend again to the yoke of provincial government. What they want is simply greater powers over more extended areas; and this conceded, they may fairly be entrusted with many of the functions that are now vested in the General Government. What these functions should be the Committee refrain from stating, which is a mistake. But probably, as they desire to have the Committee reconstituted next session, they will then further enlighten us on this and other points. In the meantime it is well to refrain from suggesting what those functions should be; but there are some things which occur to us as coming strictly within the scope of local government—as, for instance, the ! dispensing of charitable aid, the control of hospitals, the duties now discharged by land boards and education boards, and, in fact, all matters which dealt with at Wellington and elsewhere—which could be more satisfactorily dealt with in such local districts as appear to be contemplated by the Committee. The object mostly to be kept in view is to free the Parliament from the eternal grabbing of votes for roads and bridges and all matters of strictly local import, and to restrict Parliament to its primary duty of legislation, and the protection of the general interests of the country. If this could be secured' the gain to the Colony would be enormous, both financially and from a legislative point of view. But so long as the merits of a member are gauged by his capacity for getting a big share of the public funds for local works, there never will be a Parliament in New Zealand deserving the name.

This leads up to the question of finance, which must .be the supreme test of any scheme of local government. If the General Government are relieved of any considerable portion of the work which now devolves on them, they must part with some portion of their present revenue. It is idle to suppose that local bodies would consent to undertake increased duties, involving increased expenditure, whilstleavingthe whole of the revenue in the hands of the General Government, Here, then, the Committee will have to make such proposals as will commehd'themselves to the country and the Parliament, ontheir deliberations will not bear fruit. There seems to be no reason why such an arrangement could not be made. In fact, it would be a very simple bargain. The local district councils undertaking to relieve the General Government of certain duties would require an equivalent in revenue, and both would be gainers by the change. As to the . exclusion of the four large cities, it may be said that these have already municipal functions sufficient for all purposes; and we take it that the citizens would scarcely care to be troubled, about the affairs of the Taieri,' or Tuapeka, or Mamptoto, or to have representatives

from those districts interfering in City affairs. And the one would include the other if a scheme of general finance were imported into the discussion. Let all the boroughs everywhere continue to manage their own business. They are not included in the counties even now, and there is no sufficient reason why they should be incorporated and swallowed up in any scheme of local government, such as seems to be seething in the minds of the Committee.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

Bibliographic details

LOCAL GOVERNMENT., Issue 8009, 11 September 1889

Word Count

LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Issue 8009, 11 September 1889

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.