Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.


TO THE EDITOR, Sir, —In your issue of Monday, your correspondent "Burkes" thinks that I cannot be aware of the fact that the Government agreed to run six trainß on each Sunday for the people's convenience in this district, I reply that they were run for the accommodation of the steamers. Supposing the Government did agree to do so, is that agreement to stand for all time, like the law of the Mcdes and Persians, unalterable ? He thinks I am a new chum in the district not to know this. He is newer still, or he would know that at present the railways are not in tho hands of the Government, but have been handed over within the last few months to three railway Commissioners, who have absolute power to manage them as they think best during the next five years. The railway men are now the servants of the Commissioners.

If I do not go to church myself I place no hindrance in the way of others. Ho wants the meaning of sweating. He surely must have a light job himself. I take it to mean additional labor without additional pay. If the man who is working eight hours cannot get a sv/eat in that time, four hours added will go a long way towards reducing his system. I did not say that the men on the Port line were working extra hours at present, but I do say that your correspondent wants them to do so on Sunday for his convenience. It matters not what time a man Btarts to work, providing that his employer is satisfied, and he makes up the number of hours required to complete the day's work. The man that starts work at four o'clock p.m. does not finish until four o'clock next morning. Observe the piety of the man who signs himself " Burkes." He says if Sunday trains were run to suit the public they would pay better than the week day trains. He wants to make it a sourse of revenue to the country. Has he dug up a new Bible, or lost a piece of the old one. The Sabbath was not intended for money-making ; it waß set apart for holy resting.—l am, etc., FAIErLAY. Sawyers Bay, July 23.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

Bibliographic details

THE PORT CHALMERS LINE., Issue 7972, 30 July 1889

Word Count

THE PORT CHALMERS LINE. Issue 7972, 30 July 1889

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.