Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

CIVIL LIST.

The civil sittings of the Supreme Court commence on Monday next before Mr Justice Williams. The following is the list of cases set down for hearing :

(Before a Common Jmy.) M’Eachcrn v. Mec. Plaintiff’s solicitors, Duncan and Mac-grcgor ; defendant’s so’icitor, William SinoUir (-■Stewart and Holme?, agents). Hatty and Co. v Man-.—Plaintiffs’solicitor, C. C. Kettle ; defendant's solicitor, Stanford and Milne. Tapper v, Tapper. —Plaintiff’s solicitc, D. D. Macdonald; defen 4 ant’s solicitor, S. Solomon.

(Before His Honor aloue ) Baldwin v. Rankin —Plaintiff’s solicitor, A. Bathgate; defendant’s solicitors, fcievwright and James. ... ... _ Feme v, Isaacs l #-“Plaintiff 8 solicitor, «J» R« Thornton ; defendant’s solicitor, S. Solomon, Winmill v. tallie.— Plaintiff’s solicitor, F. J. Stilling: defendant’s solicitor, F. R. Chapman (June 12). Murray v. Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Company,—Plaintiff’s solicitor, J. D. Hosk'ng; defendants’ solicitor, A. James, Kenyon v. Rich.—Plaintiff’s solicitor, F. J. Stilling; defendant’s solicitors, G. and J. A. Cook. . Schmidt v. Dunedin Corporation.— Plaintiff s solicitor, P. folumon ; defendant’s solicitor, J. R. Sincla'r. Gordon v. Same. Plaintiff s solicitor, S. Solomon ; defendant’s solicitor, J. R. Sinclair. Naylor v. Undaunted Gold Minir g Company. Plaintiff's soheitor, K. Gilkison; defendants’ solicitor, S. II Turton. Currie v. Currie —Pla ntiff’s solicitors, Stout and Mondy ; defendant’s solicitors, Sievwright and James. Lloyd v. V.i'ler. Plaintiffs solicitois Stout and Moody; defendant's solicitors, Stanford and Milne. (Before a Special Jury.) KveisfielJ v. Union Steam Ship Co Plaintiffs solicitor, Jl. J. Jellicoe (Wellington) ; defendants’ solicitor, Allan Holmes. (Fixed for TLuriday, Juno 27.) Guthrie v. Lang.—Plaintiff’s solicitors, Stout and Mondy; defendant’s solicitors, Stewart and Holun s. (Fixed for Tuesday, June 25.) Bank of New Zealand v. Wilson and Taine. —Plaintiffs’ solicitors, Macdonald and Russell (Invercargill); di-fondants’ solicitors, Stout and Mondy. (To he tried on Monday, June 17.)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18890607.2.34

Bibliographic details

CIVIL LIST., Evening Star, Issue 7927, 7 June 1889

Word Count
290

CIVIL LIST. Evening Star, Issue 7927, 7 June 1889

Working