SHERIDAN v. KEMPTHORNE, PROSSER, AND CO.
TO THE EDITOB. Sib, — In report of Mr Kempthorne's evidence he is reported to have said that all wages were paid weekly, whereas he said monthly. At the end of the judgment the magistrate is reported to have said that the plaintiff
could have recovered a month's wages, whereas he said a week's wages.—We are, etc., SIEVWRIGHT AND J AMES. Dunedin, June 6.
Permanent link to this item
SHERIDAN v. KEMPTHORNE, PROSSER, AND CO., Evening Star, Issue 7926, 6 June 1889
SHERIDAN v. KEMPTHORNE, PROSSER, AND CO. Evening Star, Issue 7926, 6 June 1889
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.