Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

SHERIDAN v. KEMPTHORNE, PROSSER, AND CO.

TO THE EDITOB. Sib, — In report of Mr Kempthorne's evidence he is reported to have said that all wages were paid weekly, whereas he said monthly. At the end of the judgment the magistrate is reported to have said that the plaintiff

could have recovered a month's wages, whereas he said a week's wages.—We are, etc., SIEVWRIGHT AND J AMES. Dunedin, June 6.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18890606.2.27.4

Bibliographic details

SHERIDAN v. KEMPTHORNE, PROSSER, AND CO., Evening Star, Issue 7926, 6 June 1889

Word Count
69

SHERIDAN v. KEMPTHORNE, PROSSER, AND CO. Evening Star, Issue 7926, 6 June 1889

Working