Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BUS-DRIVER'S OFFENCE

"Only in cases which are very exceptional, such as where the other car is travelling at 60 m.p.h., can there be a good defence against the righthand rule. Beyond those very exceptional cases 'the right-hand rule' is absolute," said Mr. W. C. Harley, S.M., at Lower Hutt yesterday, when convicting a bus driver, Arthur William Kilmister, for driving a car over an intersection when another car was approaching on his right. As there was a possibility of the defendant having to meet other expenses a fine of only £1 was inflicted.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19440406.2.92

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXVII, Issue 82, 6 April 1944, Page 6

Word Count
93

BUS-DRIVER'S OFFENCE Evening Post, Volume CXXXVII, Issue 82, 6 April 1944, Page 6

BUS-DRIVER'S OFFENCE Evening Post, Volume CXXXVII, Issue 82, 6 April 1944, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert