Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TALK OF TANK ORDERS

DEBATE IN HOUSE OF LORDS

HOME OFFICE ALERT

OniteO Tress Association—By Electric Tel»erapb—Copyright. LONDON, March 1. In.the House of Lords, Lord Kiunoull drew attention to the growth of Fascism. He understood, that the British Fascists had ordered 25 armoured motor-lorries, each carrying 20 persons ' and lined with armour threeeighths of an inch thick. They were being financed by industrialists, bankers, some members of the House of Lords, and a certain foreign Power. Lord Esher declared that the hungermarchers and "red-flaggers" were on tho same piano as Fascists, while Sir Stafford Cripps, despite cautions by the Trades Union Council, was continuing to teach that Labour must, bo revolutionary. "It never seems to occur to them that ideas of class warfare and die-' tatorship can be copied by the morei powerful classes," he said. "If therej is an appeal to force in Britain by Socialists, the people will defend themselves as they did in the great strike." v Lord Snell said that he had belonged to Labour since the birth of the movement, and had never heard force advocated. If Labourites indulged in onetenth of the things the Fascists, with j their armoured ears, had clono, theyj would have been put down by tho Government. . ■ \ ■ Lord Fcversham, in replying, said that there was no such.: thing ~ as a single united Fascist movement, but five separate organisations. The "Daily Mail" had recently given Sir Oswald Mosley's movement'considerable publicity. They were certainly receiving strong financial backing. The Home Office was giving attention to the matter, which need cause no undue apprehension. Tho debate ended.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19340302.2.89.1

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 52, 2 March 1934, Page 7

Word Count
264

TALK OF TANK ORDERS Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 52, 2 March 1934, Page 7

TALK OF TANK ORDERS Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 52, 2 March 1934, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert