TRADE v WITH BRITAIN
(To the Editor.) ■".;■'■'. • Sir,—The appeal made by your correspondent "N.Z." for better treatment of the Old Country should find a ready response from the Government and people of New Zealand. It is difficult to understand why preference was ever given to Australian imports over those from Britain. Surely the trading position for years past has been such that preference was due to British goods above all others. Small wonder is it that Britain has recently completed trade agreements with other countries, the latest reported being one' with Iceland. Australia is one of our biggest competitors, and can never be a large purchaser of our produce, yet we have accorded her special inducements to compete in' this market against our only substantial customer. . Whatever friendly feelings' we may entertain towards other colonies, our plain duty is to support the Old Country to the fullest extent possible, after making proper provision for the protection of our own secondary industries: If we do not do that then we most assuredly will have greater unemployment and greater taxation to support the workless.—l am, etc., TAXPAYER.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19330529.2.44.3
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 124, 29 May 1933, Page 6
Word Count
185TRADE v WITH BRITAIN Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 124, 29 May 1933, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.