Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LARGE FAMILIES

SOME HISTOBIC INSTANCES. Mr. Anthony M. Ludovici, in his book, "The Case Against Birth Control," has an interesting chapter in which ho Shows that many famous men and' women would not have been 'born if, families in their day had been confined to two or three children, that almost universal custom of tho educated, classes to-day. Mr. Dulovici writes: "It is of tho utmost importance from the standpoint of tho' welfare of any Taco of nation, that heredity should be giver as many chances as are reeasonably possible to achieve the best and happiest combination. In a small family the chances are few, and the likelihood of the best possible child of which the parental and stock quuililics aro capable of being produced is therefore necessarily more lcmoto than ;n n large family. And tho consequence is that small families, by staking everything ;on the earliest three or 'four children—not to mention .those of .only one or two children —must be the causo ovory year of a very heavy loss in tho boat possible product of which each couple is capable. The following pcoplo who came late in their families were not only moro distinguished than any of the same family who -preceded them1; but would also novcr li'ave scon the light ; of the birth-controller's:lfulo of four children to each couple, had been adopted by their parents:—Edward: Lear, the youngest of twenty-one children; Charles Wesley (eighteenth;, Sir Thomas Lawrence (sixteenth), John; Weslpy; (fifteenth),' Albert ,:Moore. the. painfer; (fourteenth), Sir Richard Ark,wxight (inventorV'-.of cottoil^spinning machine), Josiab-Wedgwood,'atfd Pierre Priid'ho'n, famo)as>.l?rench'' artist (thirteenth); Sir Joh.n:■ JPranklin,. t-lie Arctic explorer, (twelfth');;: Thomas' :Cainpbell (poet), Charles Eeade (novelist) wpre eleventh children; Benjamin -Franklin (United States author and statesman), John; Hunter (physiologist jaiid surgeon),;and Coleridge *v ere .tenth children; Sir Walter Scott, Archbishop Richard Whately, Gainsborough, Archbishop A. C. Tait, Lord., Cromer, Henry Moore (painter), and .Granville Sharpe were ninth sons; Johann Sebastian Bach was an eighth child, and seventh children included Herrick; Mungo Park, Van Dyck, Huxley, Jane Austen, ■ Grace, Darling, and Sir .uloshua Reynolds; Emily Bronte, Darwin, Do Quiucey, Felicia Dorothea, Henians, Pepys, Voltaire, Oliver Goldsmith, Oliver Cromwell, Sir Walter Bosnut, Rembrandt, Cecil Rhodes, and Horace Wiilpolc, werefifth children.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19280714.2.124.5

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 11, 14 July 1928, Page 20

Word Count
367

LARGE FAMILIES Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 11, 14 July 1928, Page 20

LARGE FAMILIES Evening Post, Volume CVI, Issue 11, 14 July 1928, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert