NEW ZEALAND CHIROPRACTORS' ASSOCIATION.

Evening Post, Volume CII, Issue 62, 10 September 1921, Page 16

NEW ZEALAND CHIROPRACTORS' ASSOCIATION.

• IMPOBTANT NOTICE. i Im view of the finding of the jury in a, recent GhiristchurcV case, to the effect that tbe use.of .violet rays and, a certain, leg movement ■ amounted, in the. circumstances, to.Chiropractic Malpractice, the New Zealand Chiropractors' Association" desires ti state:-'-1' '■' .', 1. That, according to the press reports, counsel for the plaintiff ■"emphatically asserted1" that _th« 'case was not an attack on Chiropractic, but on the methods adopted by c /particular . practitioner, who was not.n* member of the ' " Ohiiopractorr' Association.; : '2. That the methods referred tc, torgether with, the use of a hammer, or pleximcter, form no part of Chiropractic as taught by -..itsfounder, and as expound©* and - practised by tht New Zealand Association. / 3. That the use of such methods i» not only not approved, but is expressly and strictly forbidden by the.rulM of the association. ■ . . ' „ 4. That no professing Chiropractor, employing such methods, could receive or retain membership in the Chiropractors' Association. 5.■; Tha.t the association is irrevocably opposed to "mixing" in- every form, and stands always ■ for straight Chiropractic—the thing that has done the Work, the thing; that has got the results, the thing that has made the new scienca known and. talked about thu-ough.-oat the length and breadth of New Zealand. Giles and Giles, Auckland.;' Duegaa and Dugganj Auckltuid;.; Otterholt, Bryce. and Wratt, Wellington; M'Beath and ColwiU, Wellington; Young and Craig, Ghristchurch; J. A. Scott, Christchurch.; C. White-Parsons, Ohristchurch; J. and J. Wflliamaon, Dunedin; Anthony H. Thomson, Dunedin; Christie and Kinney, Dunedin; A./R. Nicol, Invorcangill—Published by arrangement.