MORNING POST CASE
ARGUMENT IN DEFENCE
NATIONAL INTERESTS NOT
(AU9TRAUAN-NEW ZEALAND OABI.B ASSOCIATION.) (Received February 22, 1 p.m.) LONDON, 21st February. During the hearing of the charges against, the Editor of the Morning Post and Colonel Bepington (each of whom wee fined fllOO) the .defawlinfi counsel protested ng&isuii *ho Crewa nmitig Us
case on the publication ol Colonel Repington's article without permission. The Crown, he said, should have tried to prove that the article assisted tho enemy. Counsel argued that there was r.o proof that the" article was. damaging to the interests of the nation. "No patriotic editor," ho added, "would ignore the censor's warning if he was convinced that the national interests were likely to be injured; but Mr. Gwynne considered it his patriotic duty to inform the public of what was happening at Versailles." Counsel submitted extracts from German newspapers to show that the enemy was aware of the decision at Versailles respecting the Allies' reserves. Notice of intention to appeal was given.
Permanent link to this item
MORNING POST CASE, Evening Post, Volume XCV, Issue 46, 22 February 1918
MORNING POST CASE Evening Post, Volume XCV, Issue 46, 22 February 1918
Using This Item
Fairfax Media is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Fairfax Media. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.