Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

£1000 DAMAGES

SEQtTEL TO A FATALITY. (Hl' TFLEGItAPJt-PHI.SS WSOCIATION.) GISBCTRNE, This Day. In the Supreme Court,' in the case Hepzibah Cote v. Richard-on and Co., a claim for £1500 damages-for the loss of her husband, Rupert Cole, who wns killed whilst unloading railway iron 'from the steamer Ripple, the jury returned a verdict for £1000. holding that ihe negligent method was adopted to discharge the rails, that the lighting was insufficient, and that such negligence was tho Tault of the company, and the real direct cause of the accident ; also tlinfc deceased was not guilty of any nrp.li<rcnce.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19140627.2.58

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 151, 27 June 1914, Page 7

Word Count
98

£1000 DAMAGES Evening Post, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 151, 27 June 1914, Page 7

£1000 DAMAGES Evening Post, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 151, 27 June 1914, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert