Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TELEGRAMS

"THE THIRD DEGREE" COMMENT BY MR. JUSTICE DENNISTON. [BY TELEGRAPH— SfBCIAL 10 THE POST ] CHRISTCHURCH, This Day. The " third degree " was the subject of mention by his Honour Mr. Justice Denniston yesterday, when addressing the jury in the case against Arthur Thomas Reid, who was arrested in connection with the recent burglaries. His Honour said that quite recently he had noticed that the term "the third degree" had been used in connection with the conduct of Ipolice officers. The term had been used in Christchurch and elsewhere; it had been" spoken and written with and without inverted commas. The term was well known, and people were aware of what was understood in America by the third degree There it was a system of authoritative examination, accompanied by torture, to induce prisoners to make incriminating statements. There had beerf nothing to suggest, however, that ariythinfe approaching that had taken place in New Zealand, but he could not help thinking that the application of the term " the third degree," if it continued, would lead people in England and elsewhere to - think that the- sithe practice that was known in ' America went on in the Dominion, and newspapers that were hostile to t>he Dominion would take the matter Up and make a lot of it. Dealing with the duties of police officers, his Honour remarked that the advice for a constable was to keep his mouth shut and his ears open. Mr. Justice Williams had said that where a prisoner approached a constable with a view to making an admission, the constable had every right to take advantage of the position. If the prisoner chose to discuss any matter with an officer the officer had a right to listen and to speak to him. It was a praolice at the time of arrest to extract during the period of surprise statements, that could be used against them. If a prisoner expressed the desire to speak there was no authority to show that advantage should not be taken of it by the Crown, but there was authority to show that the officer should listen as long as he did not compel or lead up to the conversation. The convictions of criminals in many cases resulted through the incriminatinng statements made by prisoners. ' [PBBSS ASSOCIATION.}

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19130821.2.7

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 45, 21 August 1913, Page 2

Word Count
381

TELEGRAMS Evening Post, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 45, 21 August 1913, Page 2

TELEGRAMS Evening Post, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 45, 21 August 1913, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert