Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.


■ ' '■♦■ ■ '■■ ' ' SIR WILLIAM GRANTHAM. By Tclegmph.— Press AsMcittHOM.—CepyrigUk, (Received December 1, 9 a.m.) LONDON. 30th November.' Sir William Grantljam, Judge of th« Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice, is dead. • [The late Mr. Justice Grantkam waft born on 23rd October, 1855, and educated at King's College School. He be* came a barrator of the Inner Temple in 1863, and a Q.C. in 1877. He was a Bencher of tho Innor Temple, and for & time chairman of the East Sussex Quarter Sessions. In 1886 he was mad© a Judge of the 'High Court of Justice, From 1874 to 1885 he was' member for East Surrey in the House of Conimonu, and in 1886-86 represented Oroydon, Greatly interested in tho land question, he originated many local organisation* to keep the labourer on tho land. Ho loaves a family of two sons and four daughters. In February loat Sir William created a sensation at the Liverpool Assizes by repudiating what he do* scribed as a charge of political partisanship arising out of his_ decision in tha Yarmouth election petition case in 190S« He said that since that time scarcely « week had passed without threatening and insulting lettcrt being received hy him. He denied all partiaanship, and said' ne' was astonished at the charge. It may be explained that a* the elation, mentioned, Mr. Arthur Fell, a brothw of Dr. Fell, of Wellington, was returned itt , the Conservative interest for Great Yarmouth. A petition was lodged agoinsb hits election on the ground of bribery. The petitioii wa* dismissed, Mr. Justice ■Channel being in favour of granting it, and Mr. Justice Gnmthani against. Thd matter was discussed in tho House of Commons in consequence of a memorial signed by 347 members. During th« debate, the late Sir J. Lawson Walton, blian Atto«iey>Gon«3 i al, deplc-rcd My. Justice Grantham's demeanour, bub agreed that he was honest and straightforward, though an intemperate partisan, After his outburst in February la«t, the House of Commons again discu«e*d Hiv William. Mr. Asquith ■ said that the judge had signally violated the obligation of the Bench to abstain fri^tn cnticLsing Parliament, aim had createtl a unique situation. One of the London papers thought Sir William's outburst «rafi a swan-sim^ — a preliminary to lits ' retirement. Sucli did not prove to ba tho case.]

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

Bibliographic details

OBITUARY., Evening Post, Volume LXXXII, Issue 132, 1 December 1911

Word Count

OBITUARY. Evening Post, Volume LXXXII, Issue 132, 1 December 1911