Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Mr. W. G. Riddell, S.M., presided at to-day"s sittings of the Magistrate's Court. John Cameron and Thomas Troy were charged with drunkenness. The former (with 28 previous convictions) pleaded guilty, and was sent to gaol for a month. He was also mads the subject of a prohibition oider. Troy pleaded guilty, was fined ss, and consented to a prohibition order being issued again&t him. A firstoffender on a similar charge, was fined ss, the usual option being allowed. Alfred Edward Whitten was charged with the theft of £3, and pleaded guilty. He was discovered in a haystack on Mrs. Rhodes's property. Accused, who had a previous conviction for housebreaking, was sentenced to two months' imprisonment. Charged on three separate counts, one of using obscene language, and two of being an idle and disorderly person, James Crimmins pleaded- not guilty. Mr. H. F. O'Leary asked for a remand. SubInspector Norwood objected . The remand was granted till Ist June. Walter Fitzmaurice pleaded guilty to the theft of a cigarette case valued at £5, tho property of Mr. C. J. Crawford. Accused (said Chief Detective Broberg) was a remittance man. He called at Mr. Crawford's residence, purloined the article, and pawned it for 4s. His counsel (Mr. P. W. Jackson) said accused was a man who had seen better days, hjs downfall was due to drink. The offence ■was committed while he was in a state of mental aberration due to over-indul-gence in liquor. He had already been in gaol for a week, recovering from a drinking bout. A fine of 20s was imposed, with an alternative of seven days in gaol. A plea of not guilty was entered by William Murray on two counts of being an idle and disorderly person, and consorting with reputed thieves. The police gave accused a bad character as a loafer, £11 habituo of hotel bars, and an associate of convicted and reputed thieves. Murray was sentenced to six months' imprisonment on each charge, sentences to be concurrent. William Baker also pleaded not guilty to charges of being idle and disorderly, and of consorting with reputed thieves. The police evidence was similar to that in the preceding case. Baker was sent to gaol for three months on each charge, sentences to be concurrent. For driving a vehicle after sunset without a light, Edward Rowe pleaded guilty and was fined 10s, with costs 7s. Emma Hastings pleaded not guilty to a breath of a prohibition order. She was convicted, and fined 40s, with costs 7s. uefault was fixed at seven days in gaol. Charged with failing to maintain his child, Charles Taunt, who did not appear, was ordered to pay 10s per week. Costs £1 Is were allowed. Mr. H. F. O'Leary appeared for complainant. Thos. George Ealam, who did not appear, was charged with the disobedience of a maintenance order. The tummons had not been served, as defendant could not be found. A warrant is to be issued for his arrest. Elizabeth Lanoely asited the couTt for a summary separation from Edward Lancoly, on the grounds of cruelly. Mr. P. W. Jackson appeared for complainant. Complainant said she was afraid to live with her husband. Evidence was to the effect that the parties weTe always quarrelling, though married but thirteen months. Defendant said the cause of the trouble was that complainant was always out at night. Lancely, who opposed tho application, said that he was paying 10s a week towards the maintenance of tho child. His Worship considered that both parlies were doubtless to blame-, -but there was evidence of persistent quarrelling, and some cruelty on defendant's part. 'The separation was granted as prayed, and defendant was ordered to contribute 8s towards the complaiiianfs maintenance. Costs £2 6s.w-ere allowed. (Proceeding. )

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19100530.2.62

Bibliographic details

MAGISTRATE'S COURT., Evening Post, Volume LXXIX, Issue 125, 30 May 1910

Word Count
625

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Post, Volume LXXIX, Issue 125, 30 May 1910

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.

Working