Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A SHAME TRANSACTION.

IBt Tslkgbafh.l | united pbkss association .l Auckland, This Dat. In the oase of Hull and Co. v. Alexander Cross, shartfbroker,- of Tnvoroargill, the Resident Magistrate gave judgment for the plaintiffs. The claim was for .£l9 7s 6d, oosts, being the difference ra the sale of 50 Bank of New Zealand shares bought by telegraphic order, and which tho defendant refused to acoept. The parties communicated by cypher, according to a mutual code. The question was whether the words used denoted that the defendant was tho purchaser, or merely that he was making enquiry with a view to instructions. His Worship held that the defendant was instructed to purchase, and the contract was completed according to tbe nsage of tbe Stock Exchange. Leave to appeal waa granted.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18940118.2.39

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume XLVII, Issue 15, 18 January 1894, Page 2

Word Count
129

A SHAME TRANSACTION. Evening Post, Volume XLVII, Issue 15, 18 January 1894, Page 2

A SHAME TRANSACTION. Evening Post, Volume XLVII, Issue 15, 18 January 1894, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert