ARBITRATION COURT
INTERPRETATION or PREFERENCE CLAUSE. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Gisborne, March 29. An at evening sitting the Arbitration Court was asked to decide an application of a Gisborne employer, through the inspector of factories, for in interpretation of tho preference clause in the drivers’ award. The question was: Is an employer bound to dismiss from his service a youth who is a non-unionist when requested to do so by the union, provided there is a member of the union, either a youth or an adult, qualified for that particular work? After argument had been heard, the Court reserved its decision. Owing to tho indisposition of Mr. W. olt. Hit- eiuriloyers’ • eoresentative, the Court had adjourned during the day, but upon resumption to-night Mr. Scott was still unable to be present.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19260330.2.83
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 157, 30 March 1926, Page 7
Word Count
130ARBITRATION COURT Dominion, Volume 19, Issue 157, 30 March 1926, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in