Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANTI-SHOUTING AND ITS EFFECTS

Sir,—l have only just returned from' }. England (whore, as here, aati-treating i laws are on the Statute 13ook—but un- « observed, aleo as is the case J .little purpose except to induce otherwise j respectable citizens to break the law), | and am rather astonished, also rather = amused, to find that—notwithstanding: \ Hie tot'.il failure of restrictive legislation. J in any country to effect itti object—you' should have jjone one further and im-1 posed the G o'clock closing on an ap- Y parenlly apathetic majority of voters. ' Tho more immediate objeot of this short note, however, is to draw attention r to the grossly unfair penalties meted.' out to the unfortunate bartender who-j, may happen to be caught. It has always, bueii ii ivell-cstablished principle of British law that no person snould suffer two. convictions for the same offence, and! (apart from the fact, that these convictions are applied to only a few individu- ; als, when all are "guilty," if ono cam , apply such a torm to such an offence),' tho fact that a bartender automatically f is deprived of his or her living lor sis I months should, in my opinion, he more, tlinu sufficient, without the concomitant initiction of a line whjch they can. ill auorulo pay. Writing'ae a lawyer, I am. not indeed euro that the whole of this recent licensing legislation would not be declared ultra vires if taken, on appeal to th'o Privy Council, seeing that, 60 far, no part of the Empire ie under martial law, and Orders-m-Council do not, therefore, supersede Magna Chorta or the Habeas Corpus Act. When I addTuat I know myself of instances in, which eminently suitable and patriotic; women have been refused service with, the Defence Department, whikt dozens of others (whoee reputation, to put it mildly, in not on as high a plane) have been accepted, it will be apparent that a little public ventilation of this BUbject is much needed. The action of returned soldiers (men. if, prior to joining, they happened to be policemen) in using a military uniform and a returned badge to entrap unwary women (who, many of them, have brothers serving their country at tho. ironic should, in my opinion, come under i review by the exeoutive of that aesocia-j am, oto fesT w _ MuNTON _ G.P.O. Box 1030.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19171115.2.44.2

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 44, 15 November 1917, Page 6

Word Count
386

ANTI-SHOUTING AND ITS EFFECTS Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 44, 15 November 1917, Page 6

ANTI-SHOUTING AND ITS EFFECTS Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 44, 15 November 1917, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert