Tribunal ruling is ‘topsy-turvy’
PA Wellington Women Against Pornorgraphy has described recent decisions by the Indecent Publications Tribunal as topsy-turvy.
The tribunal has classified publications, “Jock,” “Uncut,” “Cavalier” (March, 1987), “Cheri,” “The Best of Cheri,” "Stallion,” “Stallion’s 50 Best,” and “Blueboy” (November, 1986), as unconditionally indecent. A spokesperson for W.A.P., Ms Trish Mullins, said the decision to outlaw “Cavalier” and “Cheri” magainzes was applauded. These publications degraded and incited hatred against women and promoted violence against them.
“Cavalier” was designed for the heterosexual market with a sexual theme of violence in the form of female wrestling.
It carried advertisements showing spanking and wrestling scenes which the tribunal said were injurious to the public good.
“Cheri” and “Best of Cheri” were magazines with photographs of single female nudes, but contained a number of multiple model scenes of females in acts of intimacy. However, W.A.P. condemned the decision to ban “Jock,” “Uncut” and “Blueboy” merely because they involved sexual intimacy between men. This showed once again present laws were absurd and based on the wrong criteria, Ms Mullins said. “The issue should not be sexual explicitness, nudity or other Victoria views, but the real issue of whether they involve
the sexual subordination of people,” she said. The “Stallion” publications were male homosexual publications containing many photographs of males performing homosexual acts. The tribunal said there was excessive sexual intimacy shown between the male models. “Jock” and “Uncut” were also aimed at male homosexuals and also contained photographs of sexual intimacy which breached guidelines set by the tribunal. “Magazines which show women as mere sex objects, wanting to be hurt or raped or degraded should be outlawed, not mere nudity or material about gays or lesbians,” Ms Mullins said.
The publications were seized by customs officials in Auckland last year.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19880524.2.140.14
Bibliographic details
Press, 24 May 1988, Page 38
Word Count
297Tribunal ruling is ‘topsy-turvy’ Press, 24 May 1988, Page 38
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.