Gardening course
Sir,—Your article concerning the Access organic gardening scheme (September 30) leaves several questions unanswered. What, for Instance, are the actual objectives of the course? Another mysterious point concerns the nature of the “other evaluations” referred to by Mr Terry Hill. Could not the writer of the article have given some clue or hint as to the meaning of that expression? The article presents some defences of this Access scheme, for instance, by Chris Beardsley, but nowhere does it present details of the charges that the course is being defended against The reader is left with a disquieting impression of the course, an impression based on “nagging doubts,” "major questions” and “other sources.” Obviously something fishy is going on, concerning this scheme, but my suspicions point towards those who attack it with vague aspersions and innuendo.—Yours, etc.,
STEVE LUKE. October 6, 1987.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19871008.2.70.5
Bibliographic details
Press, 8 October 1987, Page 12
Word Count
143Gardening course Press, 8 October 1987, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.