Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Vicious social circle

From ‘The Economist,’ London

Male polar bears kill baby bears when given half a chance. Infanticide is a surprisingly common practice among animals, in the wild as well as in stressful ityWhen they take over a pride of lionesses, lions are wont to kill the cubs in the pride. So are male langur monkeys when they take over a troop of female monkeys. But such examples, however horrifying to witnesses, can at least be explained as “rational.” When their suckling offspring are killed, the mothers come into season sooner, so the crime brings

its perpetrator the reward of fathering his own offspring sooner. No such explanation works for a case of widespread infanticide described by Dr John Hoogland of Princeton University in the journal, “Science.” Black-tailed prairie dogs are ground-living squirrels that epitomise cuddly innocence. Yet a baby prairie dog is more likely than not to be killed by an adult prairie dog. Worse still, there is a good chance that the killer will be the baby’s grandmother, half-sister or aunt. Such murderers have no interest in bringing the victims’ mothers

into season — nor does the crime have that effect anyway (prairie dogs conceive only at one season of the year). Their motive is mysterious. But whatever the motive, the animals are caught in a vicious circle. Venturing out of its hole, a female prairie dog dares not go far from its young. So.it seizes the opportunity of getting a nutritious meal in the form of the young from a neighbouring hole. Why does it not dare go further? Because then it puts its own young at risk of being eaten by a neighbour. ■ Copyright—The Economist.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19851230.2.99

Bibliographic details

Press, 30 December 1985, Page 16

Word Count
279

Vicious social circle Press, 30 December 1985, Page 16

Vicious social circle Press, 30 December 1985, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert