Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Rugby tour

Sir, — M. Creel over-estimates his powers of emphatic statement. To say that X is not quite as evil as Y implies that the difference between them is not very great. The difference in question happens to be apartheid, and M. Creel is therefore “emphatically stating” that apartheid is not a very great evil. Even if he had managed to make a truly emphatic statement this would have added nothing to the argument.

Emphasis and repetition have no necessary connection with truth, but may cause lies to be believed, as the totalitarian propagandists of Left and Right have long been aware. On the subject of repetition your readers will perhaps have noted that A. J. Campbell has now had 900 words in which to complain that he cannot answer a fairly simple question in 150 words, although he has managed to repeat his views on subjects he would rather write about. — Yours, etc., JACK BEVAN. March 29, 1985.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19850402.2.96.5

Bibliographic details

Press, 2 April 1985, Page 16

Word Count
159

Rugby tour Press, 2 April 1985, Page 16

Rugby tour Press, 2 April 1985, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert