Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Carless days

Sir, — The enforcement of the earless day regulations is so rigid that they are unreasonable. As Tuesday is my earless day, my HOOcc car was taken to a garage on Monday for repair. Repairs were completed on Tuesday and as I need the car on Wednesday I elected to drive it the five miles home. I was informed that to do so would break the law. The garage would deliver it for me at a charge for time and mileage. As this would involve the use of another vehicle I considered that to be uneconomical so applied for a permit to take my car from the garage to home. This was not allowed as it did not constitute an emergency because other methods were available, namely the use of garage facilities. The other alternative was to tow the car home. This would involve the use of a 2500 cc car and a double trip. — Yours, etc., A. PFAHLERT. February 18, 1980.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800220.2.114.6

Bibliographic details

Press, 20 February 1980, Page 22

Word Count
163

Carless days Press, 20 February 1980, Page 22

Carless days Press, 20 February 1980, Page 22

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert