Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Coke quality

Sir, —If I understand the reply by the Christchurch Gas Company to my earlier letter, it would seem to include a tacit admission that the coke supplied is of inferior quality. Part of the cause of the clinkering is apparently dirty coke—the coke was collected from the company from a wet sludge heap

stored in the open; from that moment on it has been stored in a clean dry shed with solid floor. The dirt obviously was purchased with the product. The coke has been burnt in a space heater under identical conditions to the previous year—last year two weeks continual burning between cleaning out, this year approximately 12 hours. It has become even worse. The attempt to shift blame by suggesting more regular cleaning prompts the further question: is every 12 hours frequent enough? — Yours, etc.,

T. L. R. WILSON. July 18, 1976.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19760722.2.120.4

Bibliographic details

Press, 22 July 1976, Page 16

Word Count
146

Coke quality Press, 22 July 1976, Page 16

Coke quality Press, 22 July 1976, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert