Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOME GULLS PROTECTED

Farmers may take action against black-backed gulls, but there was a heavy penalty for disturbing the strictly protected black and red, billed gulls, said the chairman of the Canterbury branch of the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society (Mr B. A. Calder) yesterday. Mr Calder was commenting on a report in “Th# Press” about the prevalence lof bird-nesting by children. The report mentioned only seagulls, and because the smaller black and red-billed gulls frequently nested neai the large back-backed guilt !it was important to distinguish between the species said Mr Calder.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19741022.2.143

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33671, 22 October 1974, Page 16

Word Count
94

SOME GULLS PROTECTED Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33671, 22 October 1974, Page 16

SOME GULLS PROTECTED Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33671, 22 October 1974, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert