Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

‘Nutrition first’ in bread study

When discussing the relative merits of wholemeal bread and white bread, the important point is not whether one has more fibre or vitamins than the other, but rather how significant the differences are for human nutrition, according to Mr R. W. Cawley, director of the Wheat Research Institute.

Mr Cawley stands by his recent contention that white bread is the nutritional equal of wholemeal. Mr Cawley was reported as saying that tests showed that white bread was just as good for people as wholemeal bread, with both types having about the same amounts of calories, protein, iron and calcium which provide the necessary body-building and health-giving proteins. Wholemeal bread had more B vitamins, but this was not important because New Zealanders got a plentiful supply from other foods, he said. Correspondents to “The Press” wrote disagreeing with Mr Cawley, with one saying that there were benefits to be gained from the

fibre content of wholemeal bread and quoting Mr Denis Burkitt, a British surgeon, who attributed diseases such as appendicitis, bowel cancer, gallstones, varicose veins and deep thrombosis to a lack of fibre. Mr Cawley replied that the most comprehensive work yet carried out on the subject, the “German Orphanage” experiment, failed to show any difference between white and wholemeal bread, although bread was a major item of the diet. The work involved a large number of children and extended over 12 months. All the children grew well, and no differences could be discerned between groups fed white and wholemeal bread. The white bread was made from 70 per cent extraction flour, much “whiter” than the 78 per cent standard in New Zealand. “It is possible that fibre may prove to be as important as Mr Burkitt claims, but this has not yet been proven. There is no evidence that the New Zealand diet lacks sufficient vitamins,” said Mr Cawley. “Naturally, I have no wish to dissuade those who prefer wholemeal bread from eating it; rather to reassure those who prefer white bread.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19741022.2.109

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33671, 22 October 1974, Page 14

Word Count
338

‘Nutrition first’ in bread study Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33671, 22 October 1974, Page 14

‘Nutrition first’ in bread study Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33671, 22 October 1974, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert