SUPREME COURT Decrees nisi in divorce

Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33095, 9 December 1972, Page 18

SUPREME COURT Decrees nisi in divorce

On undefended petitions for; divorce, presented to Mr Jus-1 tice Mahon in the Supreme. Court yesterday, decrees nisi j were granted as follows, on I the grounds listed: i Desertion. —Thomas Enoch < Powell, a dragline operator, I of Kaiapoi (Mr R. T. Brown) ’ v. Nancy Powell. Separation order.—-William ’ Douglas Henry Brown, an i oyster opener (Mr G. R. Las-. celles) v. Ann Brown. Living apart.—Margaret < Evelyn Thompson (Mr D. H. i Godfrey) v. Herbert Hazelett i Thompson, a clerk, of Bris- i bane; Mary Grace Fulton, of: Sydney (Mr L. G. Holder) v. ' Frederick Andrew Fulton, a hospital attendant, of Hanmer Springs. Adultery.—John Brian Hadfield, a commercial artist (Mr K. N. Hampton) v. Patricia Joyce Hadfield and Graeme Richardson, a sewing-machine serviceman; Pamela Emily Hickman (Mr R. J. Aldous) v. Robert Andrew Hickman, a forestry worker, of Hanmer Springs, and Olive Irene McFarlane, married, of Hanmer Springs; Jack Harley, a soldier (Mr A. D. Mcßeath) v. Joan Olive Harley and Kelvin Edwards, an engineer; Bruce Kendrick Sanders, a company director (Mr Mcßeath) v. Jill Marie Sanders and Roy Allen Brigham, a serviceman; Thomas Prentice Thomson, a bank clerk (Mr P, N, Duncan) v. Mar-

garet Maureen Thomson and Robert Browning, a cook; Julie Elizabeth Saggers, a glassworks employee (Mr A. N. Maclean) v. Geoffrey Raymond Saggers, an insurance executive, of Wellington, and Lorraine Audrey Hutton, of Wellington. Separation agreement.— William Miles Powell, a bank officer (Mr B. J. Drake) v. Alison Kaye Powell; Beverly Jean Phillips (Mr Drake) v. Colin David Phillips, a machine operator; Ngaire Robyn Murch (Mr S. G. Erber) v. Peter Sherwin Murch, a company representative; Carroll Townsend (Mr Erber) v. Ross Townsend, of Dunedin; Noeline Mary Taylor (Mr E. T. Higgins) v. Douglas George Taylor, a freezing worker, of Hastings; lan William Anderson, a farmer, of Omarama (Mr D. H. ; P. Dawson) v. Jean Waddell Anderson, of Duntroon (Mr ; Drake); Penelope Lynne Burrell, of Melbourne (Mr R. F. B. Perry) v. Wayne David ; Burrell, a sales representa. tive, of Sydney; Dorothy June s Johnson-Foote, formerly Ross, (Mr I. C. J. Polson) v. Neville John Gordon Ross, a footwear repairer; Doris Annie Milne (Mr E. J. Tait) v. David Robert Edward Milne, a salesman, of Gore; Lily Smith (Mr J. H. F. Macfarlane) v. Barry Whymark Smith, an engineering estimator.