Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

‘BLACK ' BAN DILEMMA

(N.Z. Press assn.—Copwrip»t>

BRISBANE, August 5. The trade union movement in Australia has a problem. It finds “black” bans—such as many unions have placed en the touring South African Rugby team in protest against apartheid—very effective, but the term itself, some unionists think, could be offensive.

“There is nothing offensive about the word ‘black’,” said a union official. "There would seem to be no logical reason why a ban should not be described as a white ban, a red ban, a yellow ban, or a green ban. But our rank and file believe the word ’sanctions’ is better. We’re anxious to avoid giving offence to our coloured friends.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19710806.2.84

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32678, 6 August 1971, Page 9

Word Count
111

‘BLACK' BAN DILEMMA Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32678, 6 August 1971, Page 9

‘BLACK' BAN DILEMMA Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32678, 6 August 1971, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert