LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32314, 4 June 1970, Page 10

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letltri io bo conxiqureq tor this column must not exceed ISO words They should be on only one side of the paper; preferably typewrit ten. otherwise clearly written In ink; and ample margins and space between lines should be left for con. venlance In sub-editing (2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O box number are required, whether these are to be printed or not <S) The correspondent must sty whether the letter has been or Is to bo submitted elsewhere (4) Tne editor cannot return or keep any letter not accepted for printing: nor does he undertake to acknow ledge or enter into correspondence concerning letters, although an acknowledgement will be made where this teems io be neceeeary or helpful <s> As a general rule correspondence on news item* in other publications, or carried on radio and television. Is not acceptable.

R.A.l.—Closed. Hilary Mitchell and John Murray.—Closed. Visitor.—No space to discuss referees. G. Mason. —Your understanding of the position is correct. Critic.—Hardly practicable in law and likely to be often Inequitable In practice. Mon-sewer Dumpus.—No space to reopen correspondence on Akarod accommodation. Luchnl and Good Sense and hollars.—No space to discuse Social Credit policy

' now. British Columbian.—Would reopen a matter (fitly discussed recently In this - column. Studious.—Evidently the selection committee, consisting of several persons long experienced in the profession disagreed with your opinion. F. H. E. King.—Dictionary definitions are liable to be outmoded by industrial practice or common usage. However, the "Concise Ox-

ford” says: "Also flour and rice or other grain." Half-caste.—We doubt whether the Prime Minister would recognise your interpretation of his Interpretation. Mr King-Ansell would no doubt approve your Implied objection to it.