Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DAMAGES CLAIM

Hearing To Continue Today

The Court regretted having to ask jurors to sit on a Saturday, said Mr Justice Macarthur in the Supreme Court yesterday when he' adjourned the hearing of a claim for £1250 general damages by Harry Williams, a watersider, aged 55, until 10 a.m. today. The hearing has already occupied two and a half days. Counsel, before the hearing began, told the Court they expected the case to last two days. His Honour, apologising for the hearing being prolonged, said that several legal points had been raised.

All the evidence had been given when his Honour released the jury at 4.20 p.m. yesterday, and heard argument from counsel in chambers concerning legal issues raised during the hearing. This morning, the jury will have the issues involved put before them and will listen to three addresses from counsel and his Honour’s summing-up before retiring to consider its verdict.

The plaintiff is also claiming £6BO 3s 2d special damages for loss of wages and hospital expenses after a flying capstan hook broke his right leg when he was engaged in the discharging of cargo from the Kopua at No. 7 wharf on June 3, 1958, and he was off work for 14 months.

The Attorney-General, through the Railways Department, by whom the plaintiff was employed at the time of the accident, is named as first defendant. The Union Steam Ship Company, Ltd., owners of the Kopua, is named as second defendant. Mr B. McClelland, with him Mr A. D. Holland, appears for the plaintiff, Mr C. M. Roper appears for the Railways Department and Mr R. W. Edgely for the Union Steam Ship Company, Ltd.

The plaintiff cla ; ms negligence must have occurred and relies on the dictum res ipsa loquitur—the facts speaking for themselves. He also claims that either one or both of the defendants through their servants must have been negligent.

Both defendants deny negligence. The Railways Department alleges the Union Steam Ship Company’s workers were at fault, and the shipping company claims Railway Department workers were at fault. Mr Edgley concluded the case for the shipping company yesterday by calling eight more witnesses.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19600604.2.41

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29222, 4 June 1960, Page 7

Word Count
359

DAMAGES CLAIM Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29222, 4 June 1960, Page 7

DAMAGES CLAIM Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29222, 4 June 1960, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert