Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MEAT COMPANIES' PROFITS

REMARKS OF FARIMQEB&3| UNION PRESIDENT CONCERN FOR INTERESTS OF PRODUCERS

"If the net profit of a freezing com- , . pany can be 15 per cent., then it must , have had to pay quite 15 per cent, inv tax to the Government. Therefore company . and the Government are "" - making 30 per cent, out of the far~ ! mers," said Mr I. L. M. Coop, presi-'. ; dent of the North Canterbury District' of the Farmers' Union at a 'meeting'*:*-; of the executive yesterday. ' *'- "The company is allowed to make ~ . 15 per cent., but the farmer is not.* permitted to," Mr Coop said. "I don't c blame the companies for wanting to:-., make that profit, because they are, there to make what they can for th«.,. shareholders, but it is our job to see.. that they don't get any more of the .-. farmers' profits than is reasonable." Mr Coop referred to statements made by Mr D. J. Shea, general manager of the Canterbury Frozen Meat ; Company, at a recent gathering of far- ' mers at Belfast. Mr Shea had criticised the tactics of some farmers -in' their references to the freezing companies. -.■

Mr Coop quoted a remark ol Mr • Shea, who was reported to have said* "At various times recently we appear .. to have been shot at from behind." Mr Coop said for the Farmers' ..j Union that it did not shoot from be- 7| hind. He himself said what he had to sajr in public when the press was present. ' Mr Shea had also said that the . price paid to farmers for ewes last ; season was a fair price on the market and showed a loss to the com- : panies. Mr Coop quoted from a schedule of prices paid to the farmers - for ewe mutton when the restrictions were in force. These ranged from ss. , (3d for the 451b ewe to 5s 9d for the 641b ewe. '"'",, Recently, he said, the restrictions * were removed and the price offered, . \ was 16s 8d to 17s Bd. The companies •'<{ must have had ewe mutton which »" they bought at the lower price and ; ; on which they were able to make * % considerable profit. , , ._

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19400118.2.55

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXVI, Issue 22921, 18 January 1940, Page 6

Word Count
356

MEAT COMPANIES' PROFITS Press, Volume LXXVI, Issue 22921, 18 January 1940, Page 6

MEAT COMPANIES' PROFITS Press, Volume LXXVI, Issue 22921, 18 January 1940, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert