THE DAIRY INDUSTRY

Press, Volume LXXII, Issue 21812, 18 June 1936, Page 15

THE DAIRY INDUSTRY

10 no editor or the press. dr—Viewing the reported and proJZa intentions of the Government, reference to the dairy mdustry, *fce absence of any definite statefJt from the Government, it is difflwhat effect it will h«e upon the industry m Canterbury, Jnd other producers would ap*rU,te information on the position respect to the final payment at Sf completion of the financial year ZUt* the guaranteed price scheme, lirihp pa>t different prices have been / ~1 hv the dairv companies now Sinn- !' it the intention, of the riTverr rr<to limit the factories now derating, and in order to meet the Suoti a‘>ume direct control of the iar'CTii* rimrninc ’ t presume that the Government pro--tJ, to socialise the milk and cream Suopiy of the metropolitan area of nJristchurch in order to control the Joining factories that will be oper*<ib2 —Yours, etc.. H. BLISS. Heathcote, June 17, 1936. *0 T** EDITOR cr THE PRESS. cir—Mr Forbes, as reported in •The* Press" to-dav, whilst speaking supporters of the New Zealand National party, said. "Here the Labour was openly subsidising zJEeers. and he feared for what happen when the British farmer Sfa up to the position.” . the Australian dairy projtnmm been openlv subsidised for And has he lost his market LTl}mAm as a result? Mr 8 G. Holland, speaking at the oat meeting, anticipates an accumutZSm of deficits in connexion with the guaranteed-price scheme, and asks. will the responsibility be?” tgg flx»fi answers his own question gHg, Those not in the industry.” Veil, have not “Those not in the iolaftry” been enjoying for a long tin* cheap butter at much less than (adduction cost?— Yours, etc.. F SKIM DICK. Jane 16. 1936.