THE COURTS.

Press, Volume LXVII, Issue 20214, 17 April 1931, Page 6

THE COURTS.

MAGISTERIAL. THURSDAY. ,<B#fore Ms E. D. lto»l«y, 8.M.) CHABQE - DISMISSED. Parker (Mr I>. W«. RuMelt), of 220 Montratl strete, -» married woqun, aea4 58, was obinrgoi} with ttuling' troia tbe Chrietetturch Oaß OoOTp#n}". Ohief-Deteotlve J, OnKoll that the gai meter in «c« cubit's former fcou*e in Gseex street l>s<t been empty of' money but had shown that , Xffs worth of gae hind fcepn «6«d, I'he ca«U> box had been unlocked- and wae empty.- After heariof evidence, the Msgtetrate. dlnaUstd the <)h»ir«. tmLIOENSBD f gSjqOKD-HAND riorence M#ry ,Dopby (Mr W. f. Tmr), of 40e Cartel street, wae charged yrHH carrytag on the business of a second.hand dealer 1 without a license to do to. §lic~wag S0« and cost?. ' . , GIRIi BITTEN' »y DOG, Horace Simon, (Mr W. T., Traay)' was 1 charged with being the o*ner of a dog wbloh 1 attacked' Evelyn Amelia Mary SJattljawe, aged . 1!J,- in Antigua street on March 24th. Mr Trafcy Raid Simon wns a shopkeeper, and had | >two Alsatians, onp of which hud been at large |q. his y»T« on the evening in' question. A customer hsd' come Ip with two other Alia* tiana, one loose and one on a lead, and the customer w»4 re?dy to s#y that It wae hi* young dogr rather than accused's old dog, that nad : attacked the girl. It had been a , darjc night, end though the sirl had identified the dog it would be very difficult to bo «ure she bsd not made a mistake. The customer, Samuel Green, wae in. Qourt, Mr Trwy continued, and ho suggested tWrtf the charge might be amended- to hie. name for that of Stmon. ..The Magistrate contpiimentcd Orocn on big. honourable conduct, anel (ilteredmyi charge. 1 Mpordrngly. He was" ordered -to payior-'tfie-da;nagpt to tho girl'a dress, the doctor's expenses, &nd the Court enste and to keep the dog' under proper -restraint for the future, AFTER HQOHS. "Malcolm Baker was charged With being oil the. licensed premises of the 'Empire. Hotel aftfr hours on Mar£h 28th, Ho was fined 80s and costs, ' y- " - J CIVIL COURT. : '• .

.(Before Mr If. 'A. S.M.) JUDGMENT PY DgFAUtT. Judgment,for plaintiff bydefault was'given in the following oases >—W. Strange end Co,, Ltd., v. r. Hunt, £4 13s; Scott Bros,, D. Gurdler, 42 6s ud: B. yiiirbttirn v. Q. An. derson, £4 8s; Smith'attd Sitfith, Ltd-, v, H.' Carter, s2> 10s od; Haling and Co,, Ltd., v, 3. Emden, #7 lp 7d; Paynter and Hamilton, Ltd., v. F, J. Tucker, £49 2s Od; Kent and Company,' Ltd., v, H. 'Anderson, £9 10s; Mecca, Ltd., v,'J. E\ Andrews, £S We Odj D. H. Brown and Son, Ltd, (trading «S Sputh Island Trading Co.), V, A, Counsel; £8 12sl()d; H, W, BuUiYnAt and 06.,vLtd,, v. T. Met. cttlfe; JS3; J. B*Uantyne and Oo.', Ltd., -l!'," Miller, 41 13s Bd|; same v. Mrs C. Munro, 1« 8d; T. B. Thomson and Co. v, J*. Stevens, £l,O 15s-9di J. A. Bosie r. P. Staploton, Mre A, M. St»p!eton, and A. M. Judge, £45 10#} I\ Morgan v. Mrs C.'Vjncent,-X4'.ss: Kent' and Co,, Ltd., v. W. Comyns, £93 18a 9d; Canterbury' Automobile Association v. Saunders and James, £l2 16s; J. C. Irvine v. 11.I 1 . J. H. Prettyjohns, £3 10s; Andrew,' Lees, .Ltd., y, A. T, Blackwell, 48 Eg, 5dL. Borl v, B, Pateraan, 4 1 : Bing, Harris nnd Go., Ltd., v'. S, F, Temple, 41 8s; Ltd., v. 11. L, Unywsrd, 47 Is Od! K. 13. Buchanan.v, H, Carter, 43 10s; same Y. W. Caj-ter, 4U 0s ed; Boyds Bros, and Kirk, Ltd., v, Owen Push, 419 17s 7d; Ngaii W»h v, <J. H.- Hedges, 415 Os 4d; A. B. Goppertli. v. Leo Burnie, 47 9s id: Mason, Strutlim and C 0.,« iltd., v. iv Williams, £10: John Chumbers and Bon, Ltd., v. 0, Beuroelberg,' 41 ,15s; ..Southerns, Cross breweries v, J. Bownes, 16s: same V, T, H. purosc, 16»i Nutionitl Mortgage and Ageney Co., Ltd., v. P. H. Chick, 43-. 18s lid; Roy • Twyneham ►▼. A, 35. OHtisoh, 4U 18s lid; same v. R, S. Crutehley, 42 2s; tho* ChristeTiurch Press Company. Ltd., v. L. J. List, 41 17s 6dj sumo v. It. Kobley, 48 8s 3d; Mating »"d Co., Lid., v. S.,J, Weston, 4SI 19s 2d;'Vacuum,Oil Co. ■Pro'prietary, Ltd v, Douglas Wright, 4103 14s 3d; Brad' ley' Bros, Jjtd., v. W. White, 48 10s; Gordon Gotch (Australaßie), Wd v the JJew Speetatdr Company, Ltd., A-39 12srv6d.' . ' JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. A', B,' Yfelhaiu' was ordered to .jay J. .Buekiinr, Ltd., the sum of £5 16b, in deficit' seven days' imprisonment. J, Kelly was ordered to flay the Walton Plumbing' Company the sum of' £3 12s 9d, In default three days' imprisonment. !