Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED TRESPASS IN PURSUIT OF GAME.

THE CASE DISMISSED. At tlie Police Court yesterday, b-'ior. Messrs J. M. Thompson and R. M. Taylor, J.P.s, three young men, Samuel Harper, Jredenck Kendall, and Albert Lambert, Were charged with trespassing upon the land of William Spencer, Lower Styx, in search of game, contrary to the Animals Protection Act. The offence was alleged tc have taken pl_uce on Clmst-mas Day. Mr Donnelly appeared for the defendants. William Spencer, of Styx, farmer, stated that he saw the three on his land among his sheep and lamlbs» carrying guns ,£i_d accompanied by a greyhound and several sheepdogs. He was continually troubled with such people, who trespassed on his land and destroyed his fences. There wag game on his land. This .was all the evidence for the prosecution. Mr Donnelly contended that, as the defendants did not know there was any game on the land, they were really only trespassing, and the information as laid went too far. Albert Lambert stated that the three had been shooting on the beach, and were returning through Mr Spencer's land. Hi did not see any game, and saw only two rabbits. Frederick Kendall gave similar evidence. They were not in pursuit of game when stopped, but were .merely taking a short cut through Mr Spencer's land. His gun was empty when Mr Spencer stopped him. Samuel Harper also stated that his gun was unloaded at the time he was passing. He did not know there was any game on Mr Spencer's land. Sub-Inspector Black contended that the mere fact of being on the land with gun and dog was sufficient to warrant a conviction.

Mr Donnelly pointed out that this was only prima facie evidence that the men were in pursuit of game, which evidence could be rebutted. It was for the purpose of rdbutting this presumption that he called any evidence at all. The Bench stated that the defendants were liable for common trespass,- but as there was not sufficient proof that they were on the land in pursuit of game, the case would be dismissed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19010112.2.12

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 10863, 12 January 1901, Page 3

Word Count
348

ALLEGED TRESPASS IN PURSUIT OF GAME. Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 10863, 12 January 1901, Page 3

ALLEGED TRESPASS IN PURSUIT OF GAME. Press, Volume LVIII, Issue 10863, 12 January 1901, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert