Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

KAIAPOI.

Monday. October 23. (Before H. W. Bishop, Esq., S.M.) Maintenance. — J. Davey applied for an order, and as his five sons agreed to contribute 2s 6d a week each, the matter was so arranged. Civil CASE.-'-Mrs lEttitSnt (Mr* Hannah) v. B. Lissaman (Mr Pappfill), claim £100 175.. This case involved acounts for loans and interest between the plaintiff and her husband, with the defendant to an extent of £286 8s 9d, of which the claim sued for was the balance. Evidence was heard a*, length between the parties only, and the questions of the Statute of Limitations, and bankruptcy of Lissaman. and Hood was argued by learned counsel. The magistrate said on the facts, the weight of documentary evidence was for the defendant, for whom he gave judgment with costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18991024.2.10.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LVI, Issue 10484, 24 October 1899, Page 3

Word Count
131

KAIAPOI. Press, Volume LVI, Issue 10484, 24 October 1899, Page 3

KAIAPOI. Press, Volume LVI, Issue 10484, 24 October 1899, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert