Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

LEGAL INQUIRY COLUMN

HOUSIE.—UntiI there Is a written contract for | tb.t , snle of a house property, no one is boimd. , In your case the seller is therefore entitled Ira chance his mind and raise the price, so lenpr as neither he ncr his agent signed an j agreement with you. POY.—The maintenance order still remains in ferre. There is nothing in your letter to ■ indicate that an application for variation ! wife becomes elisible for an ose benefit. W R.K.—There is nothing in ycur letter to indicate that you have any claim whatsoever. j INNOCENT.—It is a defence to a. charge of fraud j that yon genuinely believed the statements you made. ANXIOUS.—I do not think you have any remedy. INTESTATE.—You should writ* atrain, setting- ! out. the approximate value of the estate or . both husband and wife, and whether they have any children or grandchildren living. A will made by the husband in favour of ! his wife, and a similar will made by the wife in favour of her husband, is probably what is meant by a joint will. JUNE.—It is only the income from property thit affects the ase benefit, so that you may live in one property and own another and receive the full benefit, provided rour total income does not exceed £ 1 per week. GARDENER AMD HANDYMAN.—It will be necessary for the workers to take concerted acticn and apply themselves to the Arbitration Court. Probably the Department of Labour can give you some advice.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19450802.2.18

Bibliographic details

LEGAL INQUIRY COLUMN, Auckland Star, Volume LXXVI, Issue 181, 2 August 1945

Word Count
246

LEGAL INQUIRY COLUMN Auckland Star, Volume LXXVI, Issue 181, 2 August 1945

Working