Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

CORRESPONDENTS' VIEWS

SECONDARY SCHOOLS , : - CURRICULUM if' mmTo the Editor In Saturday's issue "Teacher" states that many of the general public will give the opinions of Professor Cooper and Mr. Blaiklock the greater weight because of their university status, and that there is a danger that the public might give "undue" weight to their views. He says also that minds trained in one field, such as these gentlemen have, may go astray seriously on matters outside that field. I think that the public can be trusted to value for themselves what both of them say or write without assistance or explanation from "Teacher." Apparently the latter is inside the fielcLof "the community's real needs" while Professor Cooper and Mr. Blaiklock are outside. His last paragraph is surely Pharisaical when it implies that parents must demand that the secondary schools and the university serve the community's real needs and not merely those of any particular subject. This is exactly what the two gentlemen in question are demanding, and exactly what "Teacher" is, in my opinion, failing to demand. I do not believe that Professor Anderson and the other lecturers of the Auckland University College are thinking only about their own special subjects when they write and speak against some of the curriculum changes in. post-primary schools. I happen to know that certain of "Teacher's" own fellow : teachers also criticise unfavourably some of the changes. "Teacher" can hardly charge them with being mere biased specialists. I suppose that in. the opinion of "Teacher" such pamphleteers as D. Loughnan, J. C. Reid, M.A. and C. J. Callaghan, M.A., etc., are unduly biased and are also against the "community's real needs." There are thousands of New Zealanders who are deeply disturbed about certain curriculum changes. Cannot they be organised, and their opinions focused, to resist the grave evil that is upon us? FRANK M. HILLS.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

http://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19450717.2.40.1

Bibliographic details

CORRESPONDENTS' VIEWS, Auckland Star, Volume LXXVI, Issue 167, 17 July 1945

Word Count
310

CORRESPONDENTS' VIEWS Auckland Star, Volume LXXVI, Issue 167, 17 July 1945

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.

Working