Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT GUILTY

AUCKLAND APPEAL CASE VERDICT INTERPRETATION (P.A.) WELLINGTON, this day. Judgment has been delivered by the Court of Appeal in the case against Norman O'Meara, who was charged at Auckland in October last with breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit theft. The jury found a verdict of "guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a crime, but what crime was intended has not ■ been definitely proved." The Court of Appeal held that in the absence of evidence to justify the iury finding intent to commit a crime other than theft, the verdict must be taken as one of not guilty, and that an amendment of the indictment could not be made so as to allow a conviction.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19430507.2.56

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXXIV, Issue 107, 7 May 1943, Page 4

Word Count
124

NOT GUILTY Auckland Star, Volume LXXIV, Issue 107, 7 May 1943, Page 4

NOT GUILTY Auckland Star, Volume LXXIV, Issue 107, 7 May 1943, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert