Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BULLER SEAT.

NO COALITION CANDIDATE? LABOUR BELIEVED TOO STRONG. (By Telegraph.—Parliamentary Reporter.) WELLINGTON, this day. It is not likely that an official Coalition candidate will be selected to contest tho Buller seat. Three candidates already have been selected —Mr. P. C. Webb, Labour; Mr. H. Lan Simson, Liberal-Labour; and Mr. E. L. Hills, Independent Labour. No recommendation as to a candidate has yet been received by the leaders of the Coalition, and they are leaving the matter in the hands of Coalition supporters in the electorate. There are, it is believed, one or two supporters of the Coalition who believe they would win the seat, but the opinion among the national leaders of the party is that it would be better to allow the seat to go by default as far as they are concerned. The seat has been held by Labour ever since it was constituted, and owing to the very large proportion of Labour supporters in the electorate the opinion is generally held that it would be a waste of time and money to bring out an official Government candidate. Tho official Labour candidate, Mr. Webb, is one of the strongest campaigners in that party, and although the principle of party succession to a seat is in no way conceded, common sense leads to the belief that it would bo better if an official Coalition candidate did not stand.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19331019.2.156

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 247, 19 October 1933, Page 12

Word Count
231

BULLER SEAT. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 247, 19 October 1933, Page 12

BULLER SEAT. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 247, 19 October 1933, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert