Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DAMAGE BY FIRE.

THE VERDICT. A large mass of very conflicting evidence was given on Saturday afternoon in this case. Counsel did not comment upon the evidence. His Honor said it was utterly impossible for him to come to any conclusion. If a jury had sat on the case, they would have retired for four hours and disagreed. He would nonsuit the plaintiff. Costs would be allowed according to scale, with 15 guineas for one extra day. Mr. Reed for plaintiff; Mr. H. P. Richmond, instructed by Buddie, Button, and Co., for defendant. His Honor then adjourned the civil sessions until 31st May at 11 a.m.'

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19090524.2.37

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XL, Issue 122, 24 May 1909, Page 5

Word Count
106

DAMAGE BY FIRE. Auckland Star, Volume XL, Issue 122, 24 May 1909, Page 5

DAMAGE BY FIRE. Auckland Star, Volume XL, Issue 122, 24 May 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert