Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.



ul p^^ l^ B this morning 2i„,» • c, -,-JF#& save-judgmentvJor the plaintiff, with costs, in 'the'following-'unde: fended. cases:--L, -,p ..Nathan, and Co. "W.i G: S. TJrUck (Helensville). £2' 18/2 \. tnro, Timber-Co., v. Edward. John "Samuel (Parenga), ,-£&, i 4/ 4 ;" L,- Austin,!' hud Sons v.JJpbert ,John Kalka (Ellerslle) -10/: T. Cooke, Ltd; v.' Kate Lewis <MerS 5 /*' *1 11/?;. John Bums and Co;V. It. Biggs (Hamilton), £4 3/8;. Ji S.v Gibbons y. W. A. Elsworth (Ngunguru). £38- Campbell,, Ehrenffled.and. Co. v. J.. Lund, jun (Devonport). '£15/; Waitemata Sawmill Co y. A. 11. Sulenta, £3; Fred Br'owhy 1 Harry •Prince Hooper. (Mitital). £1 15/; Richard Arthur and Co. v.", David'Andrew'Nairn (Parnell). £2 14/8; F. M.J Winstone : v/Ray Mlller : !(Pukekbhe), £3 2/6;' Cooke:arid Co. v.-E. Samuel (Parengarenga), "£S 4/;: W. F. Ford" v. Mrs.; McKenna, £1 11/8; W. A. ?Z2 nan s Co -' -> L * d --" v - Cour Marquis, '£9 .18/2; C. Short-and "Co. v. Mrs: Seager JE2 12/8; Direct Supply. Co. >. j; Bush (Paeroa), £8 0A1; WHUam Mathlesbn v. Robert Martin, £1 10/; Abdallah and Cordes v-"JAh Ellis.,(Glenmore), £1,17/6;. T. Strange, v. G. Andrews; £i 7/4;;Hehry f James Cobb v. James Flavell (Dargaviile); £10 16/; 'Hutchinson Bros. v. ■.-Edward'.iShort,: £13-6/4; -W. Lambourne • v. r Robert Wilson (Ponsonby); .£l'r4/»r J.'-H.-*-Baker and'Co: V. E. and W.-Morrell.(Glsborne); £6 12/; J. Bunting v. Joseph-Powell, s £27 6/T;*-A; B. J>onald v Thomas Moore (Ongarue); £17 10/5; Lamb and Smith-v. B: Aldred (Te Kiiitl),- £7,12/6; Abdallah 'arid ; Cordes .v. This! Lyons,;.£l 13/6; Abdallah and Cordes v: A Eketone (Sgaraawahia),, £4 8/6; ■Vaughan ! antf;:Purcell '-r. ': "J.'.Ellis -(Kingsland),- £2 9/6; Devonpor_t; Borough ...Council v. Caroline Tobias (Devonport),, £12«17/il; N.Z. Loan and Mercantile Agency Co. v. £7 .13/10.,'.. .Farm" - , Wages.—A. farm labourer hameS" .'Edward' Gibson . iued Thomas sheep farmers, of Orakei, fbr'£2* for ..wage's-due" tor 'the services ' of himself' and wife,' arid 1 wages In lieu of notice. The plaintiff and his wife were employed at £1 a week, and were dismissed without- notice. : It was. contended; for the defence that the'dismissal was justified-by. the t plnlntiff's;'conduct. : £1 was 'paid/into Court., Judgment was given for the amount paid Into Court. 1 ' with 6/- costs'.;- . ;'■• '-. Edward Chas; Kerkin. v; ..A, IL.Hobson; (Nortiieoto), £13 -fl/8. This defendant-wag sued jointly with another piH'ty, and in the other case judgment -was giveu:%;eon-.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

Bibliographic details

S.M. COURT., Auckland Star, Volume XL, Issue 84, 8 April 1909

Word Count

S.M. COURT. Auckland Star, Volume XL, Issue 84, 8 April 1909