S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 86, 11 April 1907, Page 2

S.M. COURT.

THIS DAK. (Before Mr C. C. Kettle, S.M.) Undefended Cases.—Judgment was given for plaintiff by default in the following undefended cases:—J. Jones v. S. J. Samnels (Parenga), £4 19/6, and costs £2 5/; William Spencer Whitley v. William Burgoyne, _7 4/2, and costs 28/6; Arthur Marsack v. William Henry Rickard, 25/, and costs 10/; David Silk v. G. Rudley (Waihara), £5, and costs £1 15/6; William Fltzsimmons Ford v. J. Rigby, £1 11/10, and costs 51; Francis L, ,T. Gunn v. William Gray (Whitianga), £43 2/S, and costs £2 14/6;. T. H. Wright v. J. Gordon, £6 7/2, and costs 23/6; Alexander Chas. Boyd v. Ella Fodkes, £70, and costs £4 5/; John Reid and Co. v. Henry W. Thompson, 15/ costs; B. Tndehope v. "Mary Glover, £1 11/6, and costs 5/; Alfred lyree and Co. v- A. Kirkwowl, £32 10/1, and costs £2 14/: .Tames Albert Cooper v. Taui Wetere and Hupr Taui, £5, and costs £1 13/6; Richard A. Singer v. James Bowers, £2 2/, arid costs 10/; Hill and Plummer. Ltd., v. C. K. Lynds, £1 16/5, and costs 5/; Hugh Owen Jones v. W. T. Clare, £4 16/3, and costs 11/; Kempthorne, Prosser and Co. Ltd.'•'.-. A. E-. Adat_3 (Darsavflle), £5 10/9, and. costs 23/6; E. G. Clarke v. Walter Austin, £2, and costs £2 S/: J. T.-Drought v. Hector Alcock and Margaret Aleock, £15 2/S, and costs 33/6; Matthews and Masters (trading as the Northern Fishing Co. of Auckland) v. Edward Robson, £4 0/4. and costs 11/; A. H. Stewart v. Henry Pickering, £1 9/6, and costs 6/; T: H. Hall and Co. v.' W. S. Maxwell, £10 5/6, and costs 25/6; J. C. Pabst v. Thomas Oliver (Frankton), £2 2/, and costs 10/; J. C. Pabst r. William Thomas, £6 16/6. and costs 30?6: 3. M- Brigham v. James Reid. £2 12/,. and costs 10/: V. Johaneen and Co. v. .T. Bolaud, £1 3/, and costs 5/; V. .Tohsnsen and Co. v. D. R. Jones. £1 2/6, and costs 8/; John Bunts and Co., Ltd. v- David R. Jones, £4 6/6, and costs 13/. " Claim for Possession. —Joseph Thomas (Mr Burton) proceeded again6t Frederick Follas (Mr Singer) for possession of a certain house in Wakefield-street, owned by the plaintiff and rented by the defendant ' After hearing the evidence his Worship gave an order in favorer of the plaintiff for immediate possession, with costs 37/. A week was allowed before the ehfofcen-ent 'of the order on condition that the defendant paid the rent in advance.