Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.


A well-dressed, rather ascetic looking young man named Arthur H. Binstead appeared at the Police Court this morning before Mr. Dyer, SM., to answer a charge .of defrauding one Frederick James Andrews of various sums of money, amounting in all to £15 17/6. Chief-Detective Marsack prosecuted, the defendant being represented by Mr. Hackett.

Mr. Marsack, in opening the said it appeared that the accused had been in the employ of Mr. Andrews as a commission agent, but had subsequently left bis service. Upon his successor going round to collect various accounts, it was found they had already been collected, and it was afterwards discovered that accused had collected the money without accounting for it. The defalcations extended over some 13 or 14 occasions. The accused had only been in the colony for a short time, and seemed to have made a very early start at this sort of thing. The only mitigating circumstance about it was the fact that the accused seemed to be addicted to the morphia habit, which may have conduced to his action.

Mr. Hackett, for the defendant, admitted the facts as stated by Mr. Marsack- The accused had come to the colony and had practised for a short time as a medical specialist. He had come to the colony with a considerable quantity of money, and had moreover been in receipt of remittances from his people, who were very well to do at Home. These amounted to between £15 and £20 a month, and he had expected to have repaid the amount taken out of his remittances. Unfortunately these had not continued to come regularly. His father was the editor of a leading newspaper in England, and he had no doubt that if probation were granted, the relations would refund the amount of the defalcations. \

His Worship remarked that he would certainly, not entertain probation unless the money were refunded, the question being whether the accused could find it.

Mr. Hackett then asked for a remand to allow of a cable being sent Home to the accused's friends. To which the magistrate finally agreed, remarking that he did not wisli to press unduly heavily on the accused, who was a young man, but this depending on remittances and outside money with which to pay defalcations was too frequent, and must not be too lightly held. He then granted a remand for eight days.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

Bibliographic details

A REMITTANCE MAN IN TROUBLE., Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 28, 1 February 1906

Word Count

A REMITTANCE MAN IN TROUBLE. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 28, 1 February 1906

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.