Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CAUSES OF OUR DISASTERS IN SOUTH AFRICA.

(To the Kditor.) Sir,—lf this discussion is not yet closed, I respectfully request sufficient of your valuable space to make .exception without bias to the criticism of Dr. Bakewell, as I once bud the honour of filling a place in the ranks of the Army, and feel very proud of the same. I am astonished at. the Doctor's depreciation of Tommy Atkins, as every portion of the Army is brave and nsefiil In Its own sphere, and none more so than the honourable medical profession. I would ask the Doctor what would England be to-day were It not for Tommy? She would be subjected to the yoke of oppression of her jealous enemies—the lower orders of mankind, :)00 years behind modern progress, though clothed in the garb of democracy ami in the name of freedom. In on<> of his Utters to the "Star" Dr. Bakewell made allusion to the Englishman's obstinacy in his own convictions. I would ask him, is the Englishman not entitled to his own opinion? I am H British subject, though not British born; nor am I a metaphysician, physiologist, historian, or literary man—the latter of which is obvious. 1 do not therefore presume to inform the Doctor, who knows very well that unanimity of opinion would destroy the human race eventually, being contrary to nature, lie must therefore admit the necessity for the difference of opinion, as doctors themselves differ.

It is the opinion of the Boer that the British should be driven into the ocean. It is the opinion of the Englishman that he has a right to defend his home and possessions. It' he (the Doctor) denies us this right, I Will drop the nonsensical part 1 have taken in this discussion and leave it to your abler correspondents.

lie aiso states that tho British outnumber the Boers 10 to 1. Iv this he must be .somewhat mistaken. This case was reversed, however, in the sieges of Kimbprley. Mafoking, and Ladysmith. He also compares this war with the Peninsula

and other wars of the past, seemingly oblivious that the i-ircum-otances surrounding all those cases were dissimilar. 1 feel very proud of the result of this war, and happy to know that we nre not yet serfs, though with the extremes or wealth and poverty. Our wealth is uot -misapplied iv defence of our nation aud liberty. Begging your pardon for all-my absurdities, —I a iv, etc., WILLIAM GOUGH, An Original Tommy. Waimanku.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19010125.2.10.3

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 21, 25 January 1901, Page 2

Word Count
416

THE CAUSES OF OUR DISASTERS IN SOUTH AFRICA. Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 21, 25 January 1901, Page 2

THE CAUSES OF OUR DISASTERS IN SOUTH AFRICA. Auckland Star, Volume XXXII, Issue 21, 25 January 1901, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert