Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT—(THIS DAY.)

(Before Mr H. W. Northcroffc, S.M.)

CNDKFENDED CA9B,

Judgment was given for plaintiffs in the following undefended cases -.—Sargood, Son and Ewen v, Maurice Pellow, claim £49 15a 2d, costs £2 18a; Direot Supply Company v. J. Fuiton, claim £2 ,tis lid, costs £1 Is; Knuri Timber Company v. Herbert Southey, claim £53 10s 2d, costs £4 78■;■ Kauri-Timber Couni^any v. D, Jones and Co., claim £35 Is 2d, costs £3 Is; Isaac Hopkins v. Stephen Gumming, fltum £2 2s Bd, costs 6s; W. H. Pott.er v. Richard Fuller, claim 17s Gd, costs 9s '; W. 11. Potter v. F. Cowper, claim, £1 Us, costs 6s; Ernesb Nordon v. Abraham Bowden, claim £4 0s Gd (judgmenb for £3 1,03 aud hearing tee, 3a) ; Kdxvin Barber v. Artbnr Frood and M. E. Frood, claim £6 16s (judgmenb against separate estate of Mra M. JS. Frood), costs £1 10b 6d ; J. MoCoroiick v. George Taylor, claim x 2 10s (judgmenb for £1 2s (id, and costs £1 2s); J. W. Hardiev. F. Y. Watty, claim £26 co&bs £3 Is ; A. Clark and Sons v. W. J. Smith, claim £10, costs £1 5a 6d ; Margareb Buchanan v. A. Pritchard, claim £13 3s lid, costs £1 15s 6d ; Macky Logan, Steen and Co. v. A Maxwell, claim £19 4s 10d, costs, £5 5s 6d ; M. Murchio v. J. F. Hooker, claim £4 16a 6d, costs 11s ; W. G. Hutchinson v. T. Fernandez, claim 12s 4d, costs 6s; J. McNeill aud Co. v. H. Hall, claim £1 4s lid, costs 9s ; Charles Hopkins v. Annie Zeigler, claim ,C 2 108, costs 11s; J. McNeill and Co. v. George Sluice, claim £2 Ss 7d, costs 11s; A. Buchanan v. Joseph A. Jamea, claim £4, coats 6s; Wm. Stewart-v. Wm. P. Hargreaves, claim £1 4s, costs 6s ; S. W. i-itringfellow v. John James, claim £1 12s Bd, costs 6s.

DEFENDED CASE 3.

J. Ehhman and Co. v. Adam B. Millak.—Claim, £9 10s, amount of a p.n.—Mr Northcrofb gave judgment for plain tills, with cosbs £2 Is.—Mr Burto.a appeared for plaintiffs and Mr Gittos tor defendant.

J. T. Harper v. William Drew.-— Claim 10b, one week's rent in dciault of notice.—Judgment was given for the amount claimed with costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18941220.2.34

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXV, Issue 303, 20 December 1894, Page 5

Word Count
373

MAGISTRATE'S COURT—(THIS DAY.) Auckland Star, Volume XXV, Issue 303, 20 December 1894, Page 5

MAGISTRATE'S COURT—(THIS DAY.) Auckland Star, Volume XXV, Issue 303, 20 December 1894, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert