(Per Press Association.)
! CHRISTCHURCH, February 9. At the Supreme Court on Saturday morning judgment was delivered by his Honour Mr Justice Denniston m cases in which decision had been reserved. Mills v. McWilliams.
, John Mills (Mr Brown) v. John !McWilliams (Mr Raymond), an .action in respect to the alleged ; termination of a contract entered into by, plamtitt with the Public Works Department torcarting'.in connection with the i^alce Coleridge electric power plant. -rius Honour held that the contract -had not been ternmated, and gave judgment for the defendant, with costs on the middle scale. Maude and Bailey v. Creswell.
In thei case Thomas Maude^; and Arthur Bailey (Mr Raymond, X.0.) v. Walter Joseph Cresswell (Mr Hoskmg, X.C), a claim for a.division or the difference between £20,925 and £18;63O, and a counter-claim by the defendant by division on a different basis of computation, the. transactions arising out of a lease of land from the plaintiffs to defendant, judgment was given for the defendant on the claim, with costs, ancF on the counterclaim without costs.
Permanent link to this item
SUPREME COURT., Ashburton Guardian, Volume XXXIII, Issue 8789, 9 February 1914
SUPREME COURT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XXXIII, Issue 8789, 9 February 1914
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.