Article image
Article image
Article image
This article displays in one automatically-generated column. View the full page to see article in its original form.

Convicted by Finger-print.

United Press Association—Ry Electric Telegraph

Wellington, May 3 At ilia Supreme Court today John Clancy, a young man, was charged with breaking and entering and theffc at Wellington on February 23rd. There were two counts, one of breaking and entering with intent to commit a crime, and the other of breaking and entering and stealing two gold rings and two brooches, the property of Mary Ann Williams. The case is unique m New Zealand, the sole evidence for the prosecution was the print of part of a finger-tip alleged to have been left by accused on a window pane of the house broken into. Counsel for the Crown said that the case was a very important one to the public. Theft wa3 generally discovered by the way stolen property was disposed of by an offender. In this instance,' however, such was not the case. The stolen property had not been recovered. As for the accused he had not been seen m the locality of Mrs "Williams' dwelling house on the day m question. The Grown would prove its case I beyond possibility of doubt solely upon the ; finger-print. The piece of glass oa which the print was left was cut out by a glazier, photographed, and compared with accused's finger records m the finger-print branch of the" Police Department. The result of the comparison was that twenty-four characteristics corresponded. The possibility of mistake was absolutely eliminated. The Chief Justice m Fumming up said that if the jury was satisfied that the finger-print on the glass was identical with the record put mby the Department's oftcers it was a reasonable inference that that print belonged to the man who went into the house; and farther reasonable inference was that the man entered the house to commit a crime. The prisoner was found guilty of breaking and entering, and wa3 remanded for sentence.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

Bibliographic details

Convicted by Finger-print., Ashburton Guardian, Volume XXII, Issue 6561, 4 May 1905

Word Count

Convicted by Finger-print. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XXII, Issue 6561, 4 May 1905

  1. New formats

    Papers Past now contains more than just newspapers. Use these links to navigate to other kinds of materials.

  2. Hierarchy

    These links will always show you how deep you are in the collection. Click them to get a broader view of the items you're currently viewing.

  3. Search

    Enter names, places, or other keywords that you're curious about here. We'll look for them in the fulltext of millions of articles.

  4. Search

    Browsed to an interesting page? Click here to search within the item you're currently viewing, or start a new search.

  5. Search facets

    Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.

  6. View selection

    Switch between images of the original document and text transcriptions and outlines you can cut and paste.

  7. Tools

    Print, save, zoom in and more.

  8. Explore

    If you'd rather just browse through documents, click here to find titles and issues from particular dates and geographic regions.

  9. Need more help?

    The "Help" link will show you different tips for each page on the site, so click here often as you explore the site.