Privileges of the Press.
|MSR PBKSS ASSOCIATION.] . ' Wellington, October 23. la Ifcmco to-day, Judge Edwards delivered judgment on the' motion to have E. A. Haggen,. of the " Woodville iiWj.mincr,". committed. for contempt of Court m publishing the evidences taken before the Wastelands Committee^? the cuo of Sowry v. the Hawke's JBay Jfiflucttiom Board. He said the solo question for determination was a bare point of, law as to whether the defendant Bouti Jutd power under the provisions of " The, L%nd Act, 1886," to hold the proposed «nq«iry, and it was equally, plain that the deUar^ minutioh of this point of law could, ia; »a way be aflected by th» republicatkw by Haggen of evidence given. Jbefcro^h© Waste Laijdg' Comnattee.; *The( ph|itiff had., therefpre, completely failed to%stablisli tHe grounds upon which 3 he moved agams^Haggen. In short, the.Court.Tw« aSk«d to punish Haggeh for publishing a matter which was wholly immaterial to the suit,. ;Hje had 'no doubt publukfcion of this matter, apart from its bearing m the present suit, was privileged tmde* "The Parliamentary Privileges Act, 1865:? 'He felt satisfied H&% *by th<ypnblicfttfon of the evidence, no right of plaintiff's ha^ been infringed; 1 and the motion' must* therefore, be dismissed with ten guineas cost,. 1 '
Permanent link to this item
Privileges of the Press., Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 2553, 25 October 1890
Privileges of the Press. Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 2553, 25 October 1890
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.