Sir George Trevelyan, M.P., on Prohibition.
SirG. O. Trevelyan, M.P., m pursuance of an engagement with the Harborough Division Liberal Association, recently addressed a mass meeting m the Leicester Temperance Hall. He said : " I think it is right that, the people and not the nominee magistrates should have the control of the morality cf the streets m which they lived, and should be able to say whether or not they want public-houses next door. I stand before you a land ord, and rather a considerable specimen of the class—(laughter)—and on the estate where I consider myself a steward for the benefit of the people who live upon it. On that eatat for forty years there have been no
puhlic-houses. I should indeed be ashamed after paying wages to my neighbors who do the work on my property— I should be ashamed, I say, after paying them these wages to get back 30 per cent of those wages from them m the shape of large rent which I draw from public-houses, that would be rented at six times what they were worth. But if I should be ashamed of doing that, I should be fifty times more ashamed, if I thought it was right to do away with these publichouses, of asking for compensation out of the rates. I know when I hear those arguments of the House of Commons what is the truth of this question, , for I live m a community where the working classes are more prosperous than the middle class, and where the middle class are, I believe, more prosperous than the upper class—(cheers)—^wher'e, for forty years, the men saved money out of their excellent Northumbrian wages; and where when a man dies now he leaves lots of money, and where a man has no temptation to go from his own house, because the house is not only a capital house, which I should not mind living m myself, but it is well furnished out of the money that would otherwise hare gone to the publichouse ; where, out of the scholars m a large school, there is not one child that is not well clothed, well shod, and as far as I can see, well fed and happy and full of spirit. All this has been done because forty years ago there was a landlord who owned the soil and who was determined to have no public-house. What I ask is why that which m this case was done by the man who owned the soil should not m all other cases be done by those who have a far greater right to speak—that is, the majority of the people who live there.— (Loud applause.)"
Permanent link to this item
Sir George Trevelyan, M.P., on Prohibition., Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 2484, 6 August 1890
Sir George Trevelyan, M.P., on Prohibition. Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 2484, 6 August 1890
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.