(Before Mr 0. A. Wray, R.M.) crvrt cisES.
E. M. Goodwin v K. A. Kennedy claim £6 si. Mr Orlop for p'alntlff. The case for the plafntlff wai that Boma time •go be bought 1354 cheep at Golverden, and entered Into an agreement with de* fendant to drive the Bheep, and deliver tham at plaintiffs etatloo In good order and condition, lew a quntar per cent •Honed for lors on the way. The sheep were delivered on aocount of tne defendant by a man named Gordon, bat were 122 ■hort. P aintfff agreed to Gordon paying the ralue of the missing sheep, bat he had not done io although It appeared Gordon subsequently foond the sheep and ■old them. Plaintiff now sued for the ▼aloe of the sheep. — Defondant applied to hare the case h»ard In bis own district, JBlleimer?, or OnlrerJen where tbe con* tract was mad<>. bat as the delivery of tbe Bheep, regarding which the otuse of aation rose, took place In this district, the Magistrate held thtt the application could not be granted. — Tbe defendant maae a lengthy statement, bat did not set ap any tenable ground of defence. Judgment was accordingly given foa plaintiff with OOtt'.
Jas. MoMillan v Mrs W. Russell, claim £2 10 j. Mr Crisp for plaintiff, Mr Cntbbertson for defendant. Case adjourned for a fortnight. The Court then rose.
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.
Print, save, zoom in and more.