' » A gtand Institution is a Roy*,! Commission, and when one has beea appointed to inquire Into any trumpery matter It (a forthwith invested with ezoeedlng importance m the eyes of the public. Bat, leally a simple Inquiry at half the expense, and divested of all Importance supposed to belong to a Royal Commission, would be more beneficial, and oertainly more economical: Perhaps Sir Robert Stout would oall out view " parsimonious," bat however this may be we still think tb»t the people are paying too muoh for the whistle of Royal Commissions. Here are a few samples of the cost of these luxuries: —A. Commission to inqnire into irregularities at the Danedin gaol from 1877 to 1883 cost the oountry £700 ; to Inqalre iato charges made agalatt Dr NelU, as Superintendent of the Seaoliff Asylum oost £225 ; to inquire into the condition of Seaoliff Ayalum building oost £743. So muoh for our end of the colony. What will the taxpayers say of the next itams ? •« To Inquire Into the condition of the unemployed at Obrlstohuroh, £250 "j to Inquire Into the oircamatanoes connected with the purchase of land from Robert Stark at the North Shore, Auckland, £o86"j "to Inquire into applloa i tlona for the removal of restrictions on the alienation of Native lands, £1,658." Surely this lsst matter was a Ministerial doty, yet it was delegated to 'Mr George Eiiott Barton at the above mentioned cost, 'i hen there is Bir William Fox, ; the total oost of a Commission condaotect by him under the West Coast Settlement Aot of 1880 being stated a* £20,459 7s Id. Mark the odd penny, which betokens the accuracy of the ojiargaß.* The inquiry into Old Soldiers' and Volunteero 1 Land Claims oost £550, and the Commissioners who met m June, 1887, to partition out the oolony into eleb'oral district* under the new Aot took £685 17s 4d for their expenses. They met at Wellington, some ' of them being Government on\<sera m full receipt of Balary, and qtherg well paid pensioners. Colonel Haultain, Dr Hislop, aod Mr pobson took £165 eaoh for th«ir Qarviges, and Messrs Sperrey (Property Tax Commissioner) and M'Rertov? (Surveyor General) £78 15a eaqh For what were these permanent officials paid? They wete ajl m reo lpt of pay, and one f a^ls to understand why each or either of iham should have been treated to a.v additional bonne bouche for performing such a simple duty.—." Star."
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Use these buttons to limit your searches to particular dates, titles, and more.
Print, save, zoom in and more.